Hee Cheng V Krishnan Case
Krishnan 1955 mlj 103 the plaintiff and the defendant entered into an agreement for the sale and purchase of the plaintiff s house built upon a land in respect of which the defendant was the holder of a temporary occupation license.
Hee cheng v krishnan case. Facts of the case plaintiff claimed for specific performance and alternatively damages for breach of a contract which was entered between plaintiff and also defendant. Udoh v ng aik chong 1969 mlj 116 iv menaka v lum kum chum 1977 1 mlj 91 v chung khiaw bank ltd. Krishnan mlj 103 the plaintiff entered into an agreement with the defendant for a purchase of a piece of land held under temporary occupational license tol. The plaintiff claimed specific performance or alternatively for damages for a breach of contract entered into between him and the defendant for the purchase of a house built upon a piece of state land held under a temporary occupation licence.
Hee cheng v krishnan. Case hopewell construction v e o hotel 1988 mlj 621 c cases application of s 24 a b i hee cheng v krishnan 1955 mlj 103 ii murugesan v krishnasamy 1958 mlj 92 ii ahmad b. In the case of hee cheng v. Insyirah mohamad noh land law i cases 2 hee cheng v krishnan 1 mlj 103 the plaintiff in this case claimed for specific performance or alternatively for damages for a breach of contract entered into between him and the defendant for the purchase of a house built upon a piece of land in respect of which a temporary occupation licence was issued.
Law means any law for the time being in force in malaysia. The defendant breached the contract and the plaintiff claimed for specific performance of the agreement. 1990 1 mlj 356 s c. Hoe cheng v krishnan 1955 mlj 103.